Following a recent development in South Carolina's abortion laws, State Circuit Judge Clifton Newman temporarily blocked the implementation of a new measure that would restrict most abortions after six weeks. Reproductive rights groups had filed a motion against this legislation due to concerns about infringement upon women's rights and freedoms.
In response, Judge Newman ruled that this law should undergo review by South Carolina's state Supreme Court prior to implementation. Therefore, the previous law allowing abortions up to 22 weeks will remain effective until further review takes place.
This new measure could potentially impact women seeking care from nearby southern states with stricter abortion laws since federal abortion rights were repealed last June.
The blocked proposal mirrors an updated version of an earlier one invalidated by South Carolina's highest court when it was found to violate individual privacy under the state constitution. Although Republican lawmakers claim that this new bill addresses previous concerns and advocates for the protection of unborn lives through continued advocacy Governor Henry McMaster hopes for prompt review from the state Supreme Court.
Planned Parenthood welcomed Judge Newman's decision as "good news" for women in South Carolina on Twitter while opponents of this six-week ban raise concerns about impeded access leading to increased illegal abortion rates.
Republican Senator Katrina Shealy made an important point during a recent debate on abortion legislation which is worth considering – lawmakers do not have comprehensive knowledge of citizens' experiences and must act accordingly when making healthcare decisions on their behalf.
This awareness is critical when exploring bans like the proposed six-week limit which permits abortions in cases of rape or incest up to 12 weeks while providing exclusion for medical emergencies if supported by the state Supreme Court.
Let's take responsibility as decision-makers in our civic roles by ensuring that we respect these complexities and make informed choices about healthcare legislation.
Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay
In response, Judge Newman ruled that this law should undergo review by South Carolina's state Supreme Court prior to implementation. Therefore, the previous law allowing abortions up to 22 weeks will remain effective until further review takes place.
This new measure could potentially impact women seeking care from nearby southern states with stricter abortion laws since federal abortion rights were repealed last June.
The blocked proposal mirrors an updated version of an earlier one invalidated by South Carolina's highest court when it was found to violate individual privacy under the state constitution. Although Republican lawmakers claim that this new bill addresses previous concerns and advocates for the protection of unborn lives through continued advocacy Governor Henry McMaster hopes for prompt review from the state Supreme Court.
Planned Parenthood welcomed Judge Newman's decision as "good news" for women in South Carolina on Twitter while opponents of this six-week ban raise concerns about impeded access leading to increased illegal abortion rates.
Republican Senator Katrina Shealy made an important point during a recent debate on abortion legislation which is worth considering – lawmakers do not have comprehensive knowledge of citizens' experiences and must act accordingly when making healthcare decisions on their behalf.
This awareness is critical when exploring bans like the proposed six-week limit which permits abortions in cases of rape or incest up to 12 weeks while providing exclusion for medical emergencies if supported by the state Supreme Court.
Let's take responsibility as decision-makers in our civic roles by ensuring that we respect these complexities and make informed choices about healthcare legislation.